Search:
powered by
Jan Norman on Small Business ~ News and practical tips for and by Orange County small business owners

Ad: The poor bear burden of corporate tax

August 21st, 2008, 3:00 am · 2 Comments · posted by Jan Norman, small-business columnist

The poorest 20% of U.S. households pay more in corporate income taxes each year than they do in individual income taxes.

That’s the word from the Tax Foundation in its new public awareness campaign called ”CompeteUSA.”robert-caroll.jpg

That’s right: individuals pay corporate taxes, not corporations, says the organization’s head of economic policy Rogert Carroll (right).

“Business remits the tax, but people pay it,” he says.

Carroll identifies three groups of individuals who put up the money for “corporate taxes”:

  • Workers pay in the form of lower wages because some of their employers’ income goes to taxes, not pay
  • Consumers pay in the form of higher costs for goods and services
  • Investors pay in the form of lower return on their investment.

As for that claim about the poor paying so much in corporate tax: “Corporate taxes were 6.3% of low-income households’ tax bills last year compared to just 4% for individual income taxes,” says the Tax Foundation is a 71-year-old nonpartisan, nonprofit in Washington D.C. that monitors fiscal policy at all levels of government.

Carroll denies that the group is anti-tax; it just wants Americans to understand the consequences of taxing “the other guy” or “the rich.”

It’s no coincidence that the campaign will run through the November elections that will choose the members of Congress who will determine whether the tax cuts of 2002-2003 will be extended or allowed to end, in effect a tax hike.

In addition to the Web site, the CompeteUSA campaign will run cable TV ads, Web ads, release of new studies about faltering U.S. global competitiveness and dissemination of opinion pieces.

“This campaign is directed outside the (Washington D.C.) Beltway,” Carroll said. “We think it’s important to change the way people think about corporate income tax.

“Fundamentally, it’s about living standards,” he adds. ”One of the drivers of higher living standards is productivity growth and one of the drivers of productivity growth is capital investment. In a global economy, capital moves around the world where it gets the best return, but (most) workers don’t move.

Here are some more details:

  • The federal corporate income tax  collected $370 billion in 2007, according to a Tax Foundation study. That’s an average household burden of $3,190 per year — more than the average household spends on restaurant food, gasoline or home electricity in a year.
  • 70% of corporate tax burdens fall on domestic workers through lower real wages, while the remaining 30% fall on company shareholders, says a 2006 working paper by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office.
  • Households earning under $23,700 in 2004 paid on average $271 in corporate income taxes, compared to just $171 in individual income taxes.

OTHER STORIES:

Reader comments: We want this to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We expect people to differ -- judgment and opinion are subjective -- and we encourage free speech and the exchange of ideas. But you are participating in a community that is intended for all of our users and we prohibit profanity, vulgarity, racial, sexual and homophobic remarks, threats, harassment and personal attacks. Here's the full User Agreement. Thank you for making this a safe place worth preserving and sharing. Share this: The icons below make it easy to share this post with others. First icon e-mails a link.
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

2 Responses to “Ad: The poor bear burden of corporate tax”

  1. Rick Says:

    So what? This looks at only one issue - what percentage of total income individuals or households pay as “corporate taxes”. How about the other side of the issue which is how much benefit lower income families get either on a per capita or household basis from the use of tax money paid in the form of programs.
    People with more money tend you use less of these services. For example while my employers and I have paid a lot of taxes for unemployment and worker’s comp insurance I’ve never applied for or gotten unemployment funds or workers comp fees even when I’ve been unemployed and had on the job accidents. And I am confident that I’m not alone.
    So again I ask so what? Talking about tax reform is on a par with talking about the weather but at least with the weather we know that change is a constant. While with taxes there is only one constant - they keep increasing.

Leave a Reply

ADVERTISEMENT